{"id":16715,"date":"2024-06-18T15:25:16","date_gmt":"2024-06-18T13:25:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/iautomato.de\/test-skoda-rapid\/"},"modified":"2024-06-18T15:43:13","modified_gmt":"2024-06-18T13:43:13","slug":"skoda-rapid-test","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iautomato.de\/en\/test-skoda-rapid\/","title":{"rendered":"Skoda Rapid test"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"Skoda<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The \u0160koda Rapid was launched in 2012 as a more affordable replacement for the popular Octavia Tour. The Rapid uses the group's PQ25 platform, which it shares with the Audi A1 and Volkswagen Polo, for example. This model was on the market until 2019, when it was replaced by the all-new \u0160koda Scala.<\/strong> The Rapid was intended to fill the gap between the Fabia and Octavia models and bring customers a spacious yet affordable vehicle. With its design and features, it sought to attract not only private buyers but also companies looking for a reliable and practical car for their fleets. So let's take a look at the \u0160koda Rapid test.<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Space and comfort<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The \u0160koda Rapid test revealed that although the Rapid is technically closer to the Fabia, it offers plenty of space inside, especially in the rear seats, where it stands out in its class. The trunk is large and practical, which will be appreciated by families and individuals who need plenty of storage space. However, comfort is not the Rapid's strongest point. There is a higher noise level in the interior and the ride is not very comfortable due to the stiffer chassis, which was designed with a higher payload in mind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Small wheels with high-profile tires are ideal for Czech roads \u2013 15\u2033 are the best choice, 16\u2033 are already rattling and 17\u2033 are unsuitable for regular roads. Thanks to this chassis setup, the car is stable, but less comfortable on uneven surfaces, which can be a disadvantage on longer trips.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Skoda<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Steering and stability of the Skoda Rapid<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Rapid handles better than, for example, the Citro\u00ebn C-Elys\u00e9e and Peugeot 301, but its directional stability on the highway in strong winds is poor. However, when driving in city traffic and on country roads, the Rapid provides good ride comfort and handling, which most ordinary drivers will appreciate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Popularity in the market<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Rapid was particularly popular with companies, who used it as a replacement for the more expensive Octavia. This often led to company drivers not sparing their money, which is reflected in the condition of many company cars. Company cars are often more worn out and their interiors may show signs of intensive use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the other hand, cars from private owners tend to be in better condition due to lower mileage and more careful handling. Private owners often pay attention to regular service and maintenance, which increases the chance of finding a well-maintained car.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Skoda<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Skoda Rapid test \u2013 engines and reliability<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Recommended engines<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

1.2 TSI<\/strong>
This four-cylinder petrol engine is the most reliable choice for the Rapid. The version in the Rapid has a more durable timing chain and most of the problems with it have been resolved. Consumption is around 6 l\/100 km, but an economical driver can drive on 5 liters. It is recommended to refuel with additive fuel for better condition of the injectors. This engine is ideal for everyday city driving and longer trips, where you will appreciate its low consumption and solid performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.4 TSI<\/strong>
The 1.4 TSI engine makes sense if you want an automatic, but its reliability isn't ideal. Timing chain issues and the seven-speed DSG with dry clutches are common. If you opt for this engine, opt for the upgraded version with the EA211 engine and belt-driven timing. Despite its problems, this engine offers decent power and a smooth ride, which may be tempting for those who prefer an automatic transmission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.6 TDI<\/strong>
This diesel engine is suitable if it has been regularly serviced and has low mileage. The fixed flywheel does rumble, but the particulate filters work properly. The diesel Rapid has a consumption of around 5 l\/100 km, but the manual five-speed gearbox can scrub after high mileage. Diesel engines are popular for their economy and long service life, which makes them a good choice for frequent and long trips.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Engines to think about<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

1.0 TSI<\/strong>
The 1.0 TSI three-cylinder unit is modern, but from a driving perspective the older 1.2 TSI is a better choice. The 1.2 TSI EA211 engine, after modernization, is more reliable and offers better performance. The 1.0 TSI three-cylinder may be suitable for short city trips, but on longer trips or at higher speeds it may not be as comfortable and powerful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1.4 TDI<\/strong>
Our test of the Skoda Rapid revealed that the three-cylinder 1.4 TDI diesel engine is not as refined as the 1.6 TDI and has a worse start from low revs. It is also not as quiet and smooth as the four-cylinder alternatives, which can be a disadvantage on longer journeys.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Skoda<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Infotainment offer<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The tested \u0160koda Rapid will offer music and navigation systems based on the second generation of the group's modular infotainment system. The \u0160KODA Surround system, Bluetooth with voice control and USB sockets are available. Using the SmartLink+ smartphone interface - which supports Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and MirrorLink\u2122 standards - it is also possible to use applications on the \u0160KODA RAPID's display or transfer vehicle data to a smartphone. From the Ambition trim level, the Media Command 2.0 system is available, which allows you to control the Amundsen on-board infotainment system from the rear seats via a mobile app.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Skoda<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Typical faults<\/h2>\n\n\n\n